<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wordvixen.com/2007/08/31/testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wordvixen.com/2007/08/31/testing/</link>
	<description>Tales From An Ex-Freelance Wannabe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 17:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordVixen</title>
		<link>http://wordvixen.com/2007/08/31/testing/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>WordVixen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordvixen.com/2007/08/31/testing/#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Nope- I switched a few months ago.  &lt;em&gt;But&lt;/em&gt; PayPerPost has a script that you have to embed into the template code.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You&#039;re right about saving the code- I probably should do that.  The only change I made other than the script was to insert &quot;WordVixen&quot; into a bit of a coding to make it more unique.  Google ranks you higher if your content is unique and they actually count the code.  Supposedly just adding a word or two in the right place is enough to &quot;trick&quot; the bots into seeing your site as unique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope- I switched a few months ago.  <em>But</em> PayPerPost has a script that you have to embed into the template code.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about saving the code- I probably should do that.  The only change I made other than the script was to insert &#8220;WordVixen&#8221; into a bit of a coding to make it more unique.  Google ranks you higher if your content is unique and they actually count the code.  Supposedly just adding a word or two in the right place is enough to &#8220;trick&#8221; the bots into seeing your site as unique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C.J. Darlington</title>
		<link>http://wordvixen.com/2007/08/31/testing/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>C.J. Darlington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wordvixen.com/2007/08/31/testing/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>You haven&#039;t switched to the new version of Blogger? It&#039;s incredible. You don&#039;t have to monkey with the code at all anymore as they make it so easy to do it otherwise. You might consider it. Only thing was I think I lost some of my images that I had in my sidebar, but you don&#039;t have a whole lot of those so maybe it would be no struggle. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;One thing I did back when I was using the old blogger was to copy all of the template code into a Word or WordPerfect document and save it. Then I could change to my heart&#039;s content, and if I ever made a booboo, I could copy the original code back in and be no worse for the wear. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You haven&#8217;t switched to the new version of Blogger? It&#8217;s incredible. You don&#8217;t have to monkey with the code at all anymore as they make it so easy to do it otherwise. You might consider it. Only thing was I think I lost some of my images that I had in my sidebar, but you don&#8217;t have a whole lot of those so maybe it would be no struggle. </p>
<p>One thing I did back when I was using the old blogger was to copy all of the template code into a Word or WordPerfect document and save it. Then I could change to my heart&#8217;s content, and if I ever made a booboo, I could copy the original code back in and be no worse for the wear. <img src='http://wordvixen.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

